581 N.W.2d 731
No. 109679.Supreme Court of Michigan.
Decided May 5, 1998.
Summary Dispositions May 5, 1998:
In lieu of granting leave to appeal, the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for further consideration. MCR 7.302(F)(1). On remand, the Court of Appeals is to consider and decide whether the Federal Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C. § 1 et seq., requires that a court instead of arbitrators decide the issue of the timeliness of plaintiffs’ claims. Jurisdiction is not retained.
Court of Appeals No. 165777.
204 N.W.2d 38 PEOPLE v. RAY Docket No. 12187.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided September 27,…
562 N.W.2d 224 DETROIT EDISON COMPANY v PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION Docket Nos. 177054, 177055, 177062,…
376 N.W.2d 176 PEOPLE v BUTTS Docket No. 80186.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided August 5,…
223 N.W.2d 652 PEOPLE v ZUNIGA Docket No. 17453.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided October 21,…
308 N.W.2d 176 PEOPLE v SIDNEY SMITH Docket No. 50618.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided March…
545 N.W.2d 18 PEOPLE v McELHANEY Docket No. 162330.Michigan Court of Appeals.Submitted November 15, 1995,…