554 N.W.2d 318

ARROW DOOR COMPANY v. WILD MASCHINEN, GMBH.

No. 103586.Supreme Court of Michigan.
October 1, 1996.

Summary Disposition October 1, 1996:

In lieu of granting leave to appeal, the judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed in part, and the case is remanded to that Court for plenary consideration of the issue whether plaintiffs’ claims were barred in whole or in part by the economic loss doctrine. MCR 7.302(F)(1). The defendants did not waive consideration of this issue by not requesting a jury instruction. In all other respects leave to appeal is denied.

Court of Appeals No. 151402.

Tagged: