BOWDEN v. HUTZEL HOSPITAL, 122535 (Mich. 2003)

661 N.W.2d 237

THORNELL BOWDEN, a Minor, by his Next Friend, RENEE RAWLS, and RENEE RAWLS, Individually, and THORNELL BOWDEN, SR., Individually, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. HUTZEL HOSPITAL, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 122535 (83) (85) (86) (87).Supreme Court of Michigan.
April 23, 2003.

COA: 230057, Wayne CC: 99-909025-NH

On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is considered, and it is GRANTED. The motion for reconsideration of this Court’s order of February 28, 2003 is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was entered erroneously. The motion to stay proceedings and motion to waive transcript requirement are also considered, and they are DENIED as moot.

jdjungle

Share
Published by
jdjungle

Recent Posts

PEOPLE v. RAY, 43 Mich. App. 45 (1972)

204 N.W.2d 38 PEOPLE v. RAY Docket No. 12187.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided September 27,…

9 years ago

DETROIT EDISON v. PSC, 221 Mich. App. 370 (1997)

562 N.W.2d 224 DETROIT EDISON COMPANY v PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION Docket Nos. 177054, 177055, 177062,…

9 years ago

PEOPLE v. BUTTS, 144 Mich. App. 637 (1985)

376 N.W.2d 176 PEOPLE v BUTTS Docket No. 80186.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided August 5,…

9 years ago

PEOPLE v. ZUNIGA, 56 Mich. App. 231 (1974)

223 N.W.2d 652 PEOPLE v ZUNIGA Docket No. 17453.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided October 21,…

9 years ago

PEOPLE v. SIDNEY SMITH, 106 Mich. App. 310 (1981)

308 N.W.2d 176 PEOPLE v SIDNEY SMITH Docket No. 50618.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided March…

9 years ago

PEOPLE v. McELHANEY, 215 Mich. App. 269 (1996)

545 N.W.2d 18 PEOPLE v McELHANEY Docket No. 162330.Michigan Court of Appeals.Submitted November 15, 1995,…

9 years ago