BOWDEN v. HUTZEL HOSPITAL, 468 Mich. 851 (2003)

658 N.W.2d 483

THORNELL BOWDEN, a Minor, by his Next Friend, RENEE RAWLS, and RENEE RAWLS, Individually, and THORNELL BOWDEN, SR., Individually, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. HUTZEL HOSPITAL, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 122535.Supreme Court of Michigan.
February 28, 2003.

SC: 122535, COA: 230057, Wayne CC: 99-909025-NH

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal from the August 23, 2002 decision of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(F)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we MODIFY the judgment of the Court of Appeals to provide that, for the reasons stated in the partial dissent in the Court of Appeals, the proposed settlement first requires the approval of the guardian ad litem. In all other respects, leave to appeal is DENIED because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

jdjungle

Share
Published by
jdjungle

Recent Posts

PEOPLE v. RAY, 43 Mich. App. 45 (1972)

204 N.W.2d 38 PEOPLE v. RAY Docket No. 12187.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided September 27,…

9 years ago

DETROIT EDISON v. PSC, 221 Mich. App. 370 (1997)

562 N.W.2d 224 DETROIT EDISON COMPANY v PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION Docket Nos. 177054, 177055, 177062,…

9 years ago

PEOPLE v. BUTTS, 144 Mich. App. 637 (1985)

376 N.W.2d 176 PEOPLE v BUTTS Docket No. 80186.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided August 5,…

9 years ago

PEOPLE v. ZUNIGA, 56 Mich. App. 231 (1974)

223 N.W.2d 652 PEOPLE v ZUNIGA Docket No. 17453.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided October 21,…

9 years ago

PEOPLE v. SIDNEY SMITH, 106 Mich. App. 310 (1981)

308 N.W.2d 176 PEOPLE v SIDNEY SMITH Docket No. 50618.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided March…

9 years ago

PEOPLE v. McELHANEY, 215 Mich. App. 269 (1996)

545 N.W.2d 18 PEOPLE v McELHANEY Docket No. 162330.Michigan Court of Appeals.Submitted November 15, 1995,…

9 years ago