PEOPLE v. GUYDON, 462 Mich. 900 (2000)

643 N.W.2d 572 PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. WILLIE LEE GUYDON, Defendant-Appellant. No. 116235.Supreme Court of Michigan. June 26, 2000. COA: 222472, Michigan, Kent CC: 91-054982-FC. On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal from the January 10, 2000 decision of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it […]

Read More

PEOPLE v. SCOTT, 477 Mich. 1066 (2007)

728 N.W.2d 872 PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MORTE SCOTT, Defendant-Appellant. No. 132020.Supreme Court of Michigan. April 4, 2007. Appeal from the Court of Appeals No. 271724. Summary Dispositions April 4, 2007. Pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal and in light of the concession by the prosecutor, […]

Read More

L D’AGOSTINI SONS v. DEPT. OF CONSUMER, SERV., 476 Mich. 870 (2006)

720 N.W.2d 306 L. D’AGOSTINI SONS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AND INDUSTRY SERVICES, BUREAU OF SAFETY AND REGULATION, Respondent-Appellee. No. 130697.Supreme Court of Michigan. August 29, 2006. SC: 130697, COA: 263994, Ingham CC: 03-002076-AA. Reconsiderations Denied August 29, 2006. Leave to appeal denied at 475 Mich 888.

Read More

LUSTER v. FIVE STAR CARPET INSTALLATIONS, 463 Mich. 890 (2000)

617 N.W.2d 325 RICHARD J. LUSTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FIVE STAR CARPET INSTALLATIONS, OHIO FARMERS INSURANCE COMPANY and THE ACCIDENT FUND COMPANY, Defendants-Appellees. No. 116524.Supreme Court of Michigan. October 10, 2000. COA: 213351, WCAC: 94-000905 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal from the February 25, 2000, decision of the Court of […]

Read More

GRABOWSKI v. SEYLER, 261 Mich. 473 (1933)

246 N.W. 189 GRABOWSKI v. SEYLER. Docket No. 35, Calendar No. 36,708.Supreme Court of Michigan.Submitted October 6, 1932. Decided January 3, 1933. Rehearing denied March 2, 1933. Page 474 Appeal from Washtenaw; Sample (George W.), J. Submitted October 6, 1932. (Docket No. 35, Calendar No. 36,708.) Decided January 3, 1933. Rehearing denied March 2, 1933. […]

Read More

PEOPLE v. ARMSTRONG, 489 Mich. 992 (2011)

800 N.W.2d 594 PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DAMOND SHAWN ARMSTRONG, Defendant-Appellant. No. 142924.Supreme Court of Michigan. July 25, 2011. Court of Appeals No. 295293. Leave to Appeal Denied July 25, 2011.

Read More

PEOPLE v. REGELIN, 124263 (Mich. 2004)

677 N.W.2d 27 PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. LOREN REGELIN, Defendant-Appellant. No. 124263 (20).Supreme Court of Michigan. February 27, 2004. SC: 124263, COA: 247239, Muskegon CC: 96-139927-FH On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s order of November 24, 2003 is considered, and it is DENIED, because it […]

Read More

PEOPLE v. BAILEY, 466 Mich. 890 (2002)

649 N.W.2d 72 PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. STEVEN SAMUEL BAILEY, JR., Defendant-Appellant. No. 118099.Supreme Court of Michigan. July 2, 2002. COA: 228514, Wayne CC: 96-503960 On order of the Court, the delayed application for leave to appeal from the August 10, 2000 decision of the Court of Appeals is considered and, […]

Read More

ROBINSON v. TOWNSHIP OF WYOMING, 312 Mich. 14 (1945)

19 N.W.2d 469 ROBINSON v. TOWNSHIP OF WYOMING. Docket No. 44, Calendar No. 42,925.Supreme Court of Michigan. Decided June 29, 1945. Page 15 [EDITORS’ NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] Page 16 Appeal from Kent; Souter (Dale), J. Submitted April 5, 1945. […]

Read More

PEOPLE v. DAVIS, 480 Mich. 1010 (2008)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. LYNN DAVIS, Defendant-Appellant. No. 135044.Supreme Court of Michigan. January 8, 2008. Court of Appeals No. 279271. Leave to Appeal Denied January 8, 2008.

Read More

WOODS v. CITY OF WARREN, 439 Mich. 186 (1992)

482 N.W.2d 696 WOODS v CITY OF WARREN Docket No. 89274.Supreme Court of Michigan.Argued December 4, 1991 (Calendar No. 4). Decided March 23, 1992. Dissenting opinion by LEVIN, J., filed March 27, 1992. Page 187 [EDITORS’ NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] […]

Read More

IN RE AMENDMENT OF RULE 9.118, 99-40 (Mich. 10-3-2000)

AMENDMENT OF RULE 9.118 OF THE MICHIGAN COURT RULES. 99-40.Supreme Court of Michigan. October 3, 2000. On order of the Court, notice of the proposed changes and an opportunity for comment in writing and at a public hearing having been provided, and consideration having been given to the comments received, the following amendment of Rule […]

Read More

KUENZER v. OSBORN, 385 Mich. 517 (1971)

189 N.W.2d 207 KUENZER v. OSBORN No. 17 April Term 1971. Docket No. 52,899.Supreme Court of Michigan. Decided August 27, 1971. Page 518 Donald G. Jennings, for plaintiffs. Eugene Christman, for defendant. SWAINSON, J. An automobile accident occurring on November 22, 1965, gave rise to this lawsuit. The complaint was filed on November 21, 1968 […]

Read More

RILEY v. RILEY, 319 Mich. 74 (1947)

29 N.W.2d 143 RILEY v. RILEY. Docket No. 58, Calendar No. 43,774.Supreme Court of Michigan. Decided October 13, 1947. Page 75 Appeal from Superior Court of Grand Rapids; Taylor (Thaddeus B.), J. Submitted June 11, 1947. (Docket No. 58, Calendar No. 43,774.) Decided October 13, 1947. Divorce proceedings by Maxine Elliott Riley against Wayne Leslie […]

Read More

PAIGE v. ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION, 123534 (Mich. 2003)

666 N.W.2d 669 BILLY JOE PAIGE, Petitioner, v. ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION, Respondent. No. 123534.Supreme Court of Michigan. July 28, 2003. ADB: 0367/02 On order of the Court, the complaint for mandamus is considered, and it is DISMISSED, because the Court does not find an abuse of discretion in the dismissal of the request for investigation.

Read More

PEOPLE v. PURIFOY, 121454 (Mich. 2003)

658 N.W.2d 488 PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. GREGORY PURIFOY, Defendant-Appellant. No. 121454 (47).Supreme Court of Michigan. February 28, 2003. COA: 228260, Wayne CC: 99-006318 On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s order of December 4, 2002, is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not […]

Read More