DETROIT BUILDING AUTH. v. WAYNE COUNTY TREASURER, 129743 (Mich. 9-28-2007)

738 N.W.2d 766 DETROIT BUILDING AUTHORITY, Plaintiff/Cross Defendant-Appellee, and CITY OF DETROIT, Intervening Plaintiff/Counter Plaintiff/Cross Plaintiff-Appellee, v. WAYNE COUNTY TREASURER, Defendant/Cross Defendant/Counter Defendant-Appellee, and MICHIGAN FINANCIAL INVESTMENTS, L.L.C., Intervening Defendant/Cross Plaintiff/Counter Defendant-Appellant. No. 129743.Supreme Court of Michigan. September 28, 2007. SC: 129743, COA: 253479, Wayne CC: 02-234701-CH. By order of March 27, 2006, the application […]

Read More

PEOPLE v. SUPPES, 459 Mich. 994 (1999)

595 N.W.2d 854 PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MICHAEL TODD SUPPES, Defendant-Appellant. No. 112578.Supreme Court of Michigan. May 26, 1999. Court of Appeals No. 190640. Leave to Appeal Denied May 26, 1999.

Read More

BERRY v. VISSER, 354 Mich. 38 (1958)

92 N.W.2d 1 BERRY v. VISSER. Docket No. 44, Calendar No. 47,502.Supreme Court of Michigan. Decided September 10, 1958. Page 39 Appeal from the Superior Court of Grand Rapids; Taylor (Thaddeus B.), J. Submitted June 6, 1958. (Docket No. 44, Calendar No. 47,502.) Decided September 10, 1958. Case by Juanita Berry against Andrew Visser and […]

Read More

SINGTON v. CHRYSLER CORP., 465 Mich. 943 (2002)

639 N.W.2d 804 CHARLES SINGTON, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CHRYSLER CORPORATION, a/k/a, DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant. No. 119291.Supreme Court of Michigan. January 4, 2002. COA: 225847, WCAC: 99-0110 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal from the May 1, 2001 decision of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is GRANTED. The parties […]

Read More

DETROIT v. COMM’R OF REVENUE, 330 Mich. 239 (1951)

47 N.W.2d 4 CITY OF DETROIT v. STATE COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE. Calendar No. 44,964.Supreme Court of Michigan. Writ denied April 3, 1951. Page 240 Mandamus by City of Detroit to compel Louis M. Nims, State Commissioner of Revenue, and others to make distribution of sales-tax and intangibles-tax revenues on basis of 1940 census. Submitted January […]

Read More

PEOPLE v. MILES, 376 Mich. 165 (1965)

136 N.W.2d 4 PEOPLE v. MILES. Calendar No. 29, Docket No. 50,762.Supreme Court of Michigan. Decided July 13, 1965. Appeal from Ingham; Hughes (Sam Street), J. Submitted May 13, 1965. (Calendar No. 29, Docket No. 50,762.) Decided July 13, 1965. Ronnie Miles was convicted for violation of the narcotics law. Remanded. Frank J. Kelley, Attorney […]

Read More

KOLAREVIC GROUP v. MICHIGAN DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION, 460 Mich. 862 (1999)

598 N.W.2d 340 KOLAREVIC GROUP, L.L.C., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MICHIGAN DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION, Defendant-Appellee. No. 113527Supreme Court of Michigan. June 29, 1999. On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 2, 1998 decision of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the […]

Read More

PEOPLE v. EMERICK, 477 Mich. 973 (2006)

725 N.W.2d 23 PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JOHN PATRICK EMERICK, Defendant-Appellant. No. 131921.Supreme Court of Michigan. December 28, 2006. Appeal from the Court of Appeals No. 268307. Leave to Appeal Denied December 28, 2006.

Read More

GOLDSTICK v. THOMAS, 237 Mich. 236 (1927)

211 N.W. 666 GOLDSTICK v. THOMAS. Docket No. 86.Supreme Court of Michigan.Submitted October 20, 1926. Decided January 3, 1927. Rehearing denied April 1, 1927. Appeal from Wayne; Miller (Guy A.), J. Submitted October 20, 1926. (Docket No. 86.) Decided January 3, 1927. Rehearing denied April 1, 1927. Bill by Hilliard W. Goldstick and another against […]

Read More

MONROE v. DENISTON, 129518 (Mich. 11-2-2005)

705 N.W.2d 352 VAUGHN WAYNE MONROE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LARRY DENISTON, Defendant-Appellee. No. 129518 (13).Supreme Court of Michigan. November 2, 2005. SC: 129518, COA: 264069. On order of the Chief Justice, the motion for reconsideration of the order of September 21, 2005 is considered and it is DENIED because it does not appear the order was […]

Read More

CITY OF ALLEGAN v. VONASEK, 259 Mich. 310 (1932)

243 N.W. 14 CITY OF ALLEGAN v. VONASEK. Docket No. 51, Calendar No. 36,372.Supreme Court of Michigan.Submitted April 20, 1932. Decided June 6, 1932. Page 311 Appeal from Allegan; Miles (Fred T.), J. Submitted April 20, 1932. (Docket No. 51, Calendar No. 36,372.) Decided June 6, 1932. Condemnation proceedings by City of Allegan against Joseph […]

Read More

MOORE v. POWERS, 241 Mich. 567 (1928)

217 N.W. 780 MOORE v. POWERS. Docket No. 93.Supreme Court of Michigan.Submitted January 6, 1928. Decided February 14, 1928. Certiorari to Washtenaw; Sample (George W.), J. Submitted January 6, 1928. (Docket No. 93.) Decided February 14, 1928. Habeas corpus proceedings by Addie Moore against Chester Powers and another to obtain the custody of an infant. […]

Read More

PEOPLE v. BENNETT, 463 Mich. 876 (2000)

618 N.W.2d 593 PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MICHAEL WAYNE BENNETT, Defendant-Appellant. No. 116664.Supreme Court of Michigan. September 26, 2000. COA: 223532, Michigan, Wayne CC: 97-500336. On order of the Court, the delayed application for leave to appeal from the February 18, 2000 decision of the Court of Appeals is considered, and […]

Read More

FRENCH v. GRAND BEACH CO., 239 Mich. 575 (1927)

215 N.W. 13 FRENCH v. GRAND BEACH CO. SAME v. BERRIEN CIRCUIT JUDGE. MOORE v. SAME. Docket No. 170.Supreme Court of Michigan.Submitted January 21, 1927. Decided July 29, 1927. Rehearing denied October 3, 1927. Page 576 [EDITORS’ NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT […]

Read More

MIGALDI v. ELECTRONIC DATA SYSTEMS CORPORATION, 117043 (Mich. 10-25-2000)

618 N.W.2d 769 SALVATORE MIGALDI, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ELECTRONIC DATA SYSTEMS CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee. No. 117043.Supreme Court of Michigan. October 25, 2000. COA 212917, Ingham 96-83303 On order of the Chief Justice, a stipulation signed by the attorneys for the parties agreeing to the dismissal of the application for leave to appeal in this matter is considered […]

Read More