618 N.W.2d 594 PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JAMES N. PARR, JR., Defendant-Appellant. No. 116157(21).Supreme Court of Michigan. September 26, 2000. Appeal from COA: 218336, Michigan, Rec Ct: 89-008904. On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s order of June 26, 2000 is considered, and it is DENIED […]
Category: Michigan Supreme Court Opinions
JAEGER v. MITCHELL, 277 Mich. 464 (1936)
269 N.W. 235 JAEGER v. MITCHELL. Supreme Court of Michigan.Submitted September 14, 1936. (Calendar No. 38,610.) Decided October 16, 1936. Page 465 Appeal from Berrien; White (Charles E.), J. Submitted September 14, 1936. (Calendar No. 38,610.) Decided October 16, 1936. Case by Katherine M. Jaeger against Carl A. Mitchell for damages for malpractice. Verdict for […]
PEOPLE v. RICHARD, 480 Mich. 957 (2007)
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. RICARDO LAMONT RICHARD, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 134842, 134843.Supreme Court of Michigan. November 29, 2007. Court of Appeals Nos. 269203, 272072. Leave to Appeal Denied November 29, 2007: Page 958
PEOPLE v. DRAKE, 459 Mich. 960 (1999)
591 N.W.2d 35 PEOPLE v. DRAKE. No. 112815.Supreme Court of Michigan. March 30, 1999. Court of Appeals No. 211195.
PEOPLE v. HILL, 459 Mich. 908 (1998)
589 N.W.2d 286 PEOPLE v. MICHAEL D HILL. No. 111701.Supreme Court of Michigan. November 24, 1998. Leave to Appeal Denied November 24, 1998. The defendant has failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). Court of Appeals No. 200079.
PEOPLE v. REED, 486 Mich. 899 (2010)
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MALCOLM OWEN REED, Defendant-Appellant. No. 139362.Supreme Court of Michigan. April 27, 2010. Court of Appeals No. 283218. Leave to Appeal Denied.
RIEMERSMA-STOREY v. RIEMERSMA, 485 Mich. 1010 (2009)
RIEMERSMA-STOREY v. RIEMERSMA. No. 139490.Supreme Court of Michigan. December 21, 2009. Appeal from the Court of Appeals No. 291490. Leave to Appeal Denied.
PEOPLE v. ORTEGA, 459 Mich. 871 (1998)
584 N.W.2d 738 PEOPLE v. ORTEGA. No. 111477.Supreme Court of Michigan. September 28, 1998. Leave to Appeal Denied September 28, 1998. Court of Appeals No. 196815.
PEOPLE v. BELL, 487 Mich. 857 (2010)
PEOPLE v. GOLDEN BELL. No. 141016.Supreme Court of Michigan. Denied July 26, 2010. Court of Appeals No. 296674.
PEOPLE v. SANTANA, 461 Mich. 943 (1999)
606 N.W.2d 28 PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ABELINO SANTANA, Defendant-Appellant. No. 115066.Supreme Court of Michigan. December 28, 1999. On order of the Court, the delayed application for leave to appeal from the May 25, 1999 decision of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not […]
VAN EENENNAAM v. REYERSE, 240 Mich. 454 (1927)
215 N.W. 389 VAN EENENNAAM v. REYERSE. Docket No. 59.Supreme Court of Michigan.Submitted June 15, 1927. Decided October 3, 1927. Page 455 Appeal from Kent; Brown (William B.), J. Submitted June 15, 1927. (Docket No. 59.) Decided October 3, 1927. Bill by Hillis Van Eenennaam against Cornelius Reyerse and another for specific performance of a […]
PEOPLE v. REINGARDT, 477 Mich. 981 (2007)
725 N.W.2d 341 PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. GARY ALLEN REINGARDT, Defendant-Appellant. No. 132337.Supreme Court of Michigan. January 4, 2007. Appeal from the Court of Appeals No. 271761. Leave to Appeal Denied January 4, 2007.
PEOPLE v. PHIFER, 459 Mich. 906 (1998)
589 N.W.2d 286 PEOPLE v. PHIFER. No. 111441.Supreme Court of Michigan. November 24, 1998. Leave to Appeal Denied November 24, 1998. Court of Appeals No. 195264.
LILLY v. SCHMOCK, 297 Mich. 513 (1941)
298 N.W. 116 LILLY v. SCHMOCK. Docket No. 41, Calendar No. 41,541.Supreme Court of Michigan.Submitted April 9, 1941. Decided May 21, 1941. Page 514 Appeal from Kent; Verdier (Leonard D.), J. Submitted April 9, 1941. (Docket No. 41, Calendar No. 41,541.) Decided May 21, 1941. Assumpsit by Norman A. Lilly, administrator of the estate of […]
HUBERT v. JOSLIN, 285 Mich. 337 (1938)
280 N.W. 780 HUBERT v. JOSLIN. Docket No. 22, Calendar No. 39,813.Supreme Court of Michigan.Submitted April 15, 1938. Decided June 30, 1938. Rehearing denied October 3, 1938. Page 338 [EDITORS’ NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] Page 339 Appeal from Muskegon; Sanford […]
PEOPLE v. LEWIS, 474 Mich. 906 (2005)
705 N.W.2d 125 PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CHARLES ADAM LEWIS, Defendant-Appellant. No. 128785.Supreme Court of Michigan. October 31, 2005. SC: 128785, COA: 259422, Macomb CC: 04-000513-FC; 04-000827-FC; 04-000828-FC; 04-000829-FC. On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 6, 2005 order of the Court of Appeals is […]
CURRY v. MEIJER INCORPORATED, 486 Mich. 961 (2010)
CURRY v. MEIJER INCORPORATED. No. 140635.Supreme Court of Michigan. June 10, 2010. reported below. 286 Mich App 586. Leave to Appeal Denied. KELLY, C.J., and HATHAWAY, J., would grant leave to appeal. CAVANAGH, J., not participating due to a familial relationship with counsel of record.
PEOPLE v. BILYEU, 456 Mich. 875 (1997)
569 N.W.2d 164 PEOPLE v. BILYEU. No. 108367.Supreme Court of Michigan. Leave to Appeal Denied September 29, 1997. Court of Appeals No. 188595.
PEOPLE v. NEVERS, 123504 (Mich. 2003)
662 N.W.2d 754 PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, Cross-Appellee, v. LARRY A. NEVERS, Defendant-Appellee, Cross-Appellant. No. 123504 (79).Supreme Court of Michigan. May 30, 2003. COA: 227401, Wayne CC: 93-000667 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal and the application for leave to appeal as cross-appellant from the March 6, […]
MICHIGAN DEF PRE. SERV v. COMMISSIONER, FIN, REGUL., 487 Mich. 855 (2010)
MICHIGAN DEFERRED PRESENTMENT SERVICES ASSOCIATION, INCORPORATED v. COMMISSIONER OF THE OFFICE OF FINANCIAL AND INSURANCE REGULATION. No. 140863.Supreme Court of Michigan. Denied July 26, 2010. Reported below: 287 Mich App 326. On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 18, 2010 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and […]