PAPER PRODUCTS CO. v. IGNITION CO., 236 Mich. 90 (1926)

210 N.W. 222 SPRINGMAN PAPER PRODUCTS CO. v. DETROIT IGNITION CO. Docket No. 8.Supreme Court of Michigan.October 7, 1925. Decided October 4, 1926. Error to Wayne; Miller (Guy A.), J. Submitted Page 91 October 7, 1925. (Docket No. 8.) Decided October 4, 1926. Case by the Springman Paper Products Company against the Detroit Ignition Company […]

Read More

IN RE ROSS, 461 Mich. 862 (1999)

602 N.W.2d 577 In Re MATTHEW ALLAN ROSS, HARRISON NEIL ROSS and MARION MAY ROSS, Minors. DENNIS N. ROSS, Appellant. No. 114090.Supreme Court of Michigan. September 14, 1999. On order of the Court, the delayed application for leave to appeal from the December 18, 1998 decision of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it […]

Read More

PERE MARQUETTE RAILWAY CO. v. WILCOX, 236 Mich. 254 (1926)

210 N.W. 331 PERE MARQUETTE RAILWAY CO. v. WILCOX. Docket No. 22.Supreme Court of Michigan.Submitted June 8, 1926. Decided October 4, 1926. Page 255 Error to Van Buren; Hawley (Royal A.), J., presiding. Submitted June 8, 1926. (Docket No. 22.) Decided October 4, 1926. Assumpsit by the Pere Marquette Railway Company against Eugene I. Wilcox, […]

Read More

PEOPLE v. GEORGE, 375 Mich. 262 (1965)

134 N.W.2d 222 PEOPLE v. GEORGE. Calendar No. 51, Docket No. 50,758.Supreme Court of Michigan. Decided April 9, 1965. Delayed motion for rehearing dismissed May 10, 1966. Page 263 Appeal from the Recorder’s Court for the City of Detroit; O’Hara (John P.), J. Submitted February 5, 1965. (Calendar No. 51, Docket No. 50,758.) Decided April […]

Read More

PEOPLE v. FOLEY, 463 Mich. 923 (2000)

619 N.W.2d 545 PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CHARLES NORTON FOLEY, Defendant-Appellant. No. 117278.Supreme Court of Michigan. November 29, 2000. COA: 226808, Livingston CC: 97-010140-FH On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal from the June 23, 2000 decision of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is […]

Read More

ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO. 2002-1 (Mich. 2002)

ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO. 2002-1. CHILD SUPPORT LEADERSHIP COUNCIL. Supreme Court of Michigan. April 11, 2002. On order of the Court, the following order is effective immediately. Recognizing the integral role played by the judicial branch in the operation of programs affecting Michigan’s families, this Court joined the Governor in 1997 in establishing the Child Support […]

Read More

FORS v. THOMAN, 267 Mich. 148 (1934)

255 N.W. 297 FORS v. THOMAN. Docket No. 27, Calendar No. 37,521.Supreme Court of Michigan.Submitted April 19, 1934. Decided June 4, 1934. Page 149 Appeal from Ingham; Warner (Glenn E.), J., presiding. Submitted April 19, 1934. (Docket No. 27, Calendar No. 37,521.) Decided June 4, 1934. Bill by Carl A. Fors, receiver of the American […]

Read More

PEOPLE v. REED, 482 Mich. 973 (2008)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ERICK LAMONT REED, Defendant-Appellant. No. 136161.Supreme Court of Michigan. September 9, 2008. Court of Appeals No. 279601. Leave to Appeal Denied at September 9, 2008. The defendant has failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).

Read More

PEOPLE v. DESMYTHER, 465 Mich. 961 (2002)

640 N.W.2d 876 PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. LARRY SCOTT DESMYTHER, Defendant-Appellant. No. 120122.Supreme Court of Michigan. March 4, 2002. COA: 234342, Saginaw CC: 95-010845-FH. On order of the Court, the delayed application for leave to appeal from the August 6, 2001 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it […]

Read More

FENELEY v. KIMMELL, 318 Mich. 632 (1947)

29 N.W.2d 289 FENELEY v. KIMMELL. Docket No. 38, Calendar No. 43,763.Supreme Court of Michigan. Decided October 13, 1947. Rehearing denied December 3, 1947. Page 633 Appeal from Luce; Runnels (Herbert W.), J. Submitted June 5, 1947. (Docket No. 38, Calendar No. 43,763.) Decided October 13, 1947. Rehearing denied December 3, 1947. Bill by George […]

Read More

PEOPLE v. HAMMOND, 143602 (Mich. 11-21-2011)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JOHN JASON HAMMOND, Defendant-Appellant. No. 143602.Supreme Court of Michigan. November 21, 2011. Order SC: 143602, COA: 296055, Antrim CC: 09-004275-FC On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 23, 2011 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, it appearing to […]

Read More

PEOPLE v. JOHNSON, 115815 (Mich. 4-25-2000)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. LEO JOHNSON, JR., Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 115815, 115816.Supreme Court of Michigan. April 25, 2000. On order of the Court, the delayed application for leave to appeal from the October 1, 1999 decision of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded […]

Read More

HAY v. LeBUS, 317 Mich. 698 (1947)

27 N.W.2d 309 HAY v. LeBUS. Docket No. 42, Calendar No. 43,230.Supreme Court of Michigan. Decided May 16, 1947. Page 699 [EDITORS’ NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] Page 700 Appeal from Saginaw; Holland (Robert T.), J. Submitted January 9, 1946. (Docket […]

Read More

HILL v. FAIRCLOTH MFG. CO., 119363 (Mich. 1-23-2002)

639 N.W.2d 807 JACK D. HILL, Deceased, by EDWARD F. HILL, Personal Representative, Plaintiff-Appellee, and AUTOMOBILE CLUB OF MICHIGAN, Intervening Plaintiff-Appellee, v. FAIRCLOTH MANUFACTURING COMPANY and ACCIDENT FUND COMPANY, Defendants-Appellants. No. 119363.Supreme Court of Michigan. January 23, 2002. COA: 221335, WCAC: 98-000144. On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal from the […]

Read More

WOLFROM v. HILLCREST MEMORIAL GARDENS ASSC., 114568 (Mich. 6-27-2000)

613 N.W.2d 724 FOREST WOLFROM and CHARLOTTE WOLFROM, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. HILLCREST MEMORIAL GARDENS ASSOCIATION, Defendant-Appellant. No. 114568.Supreme Court of Michigan. June 27, 2000. Appeal from COA: 204746, Michigan, Shiawassee CC: 96-060280-NO. On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal from the April 6, 1999 decision of the Court of Appeals is considered […]

Read More