560 N.W.2d 637
No. 104107.Supreme Court of Michigan.
March 12, 1997.
Leave to Appeal Granted March 12, 1997:
The issue is limited to whether the lower courts erroneously applied the date of manifestation of injury as the appropriate trigger of coverage for determination of insurance carrier responsibility to the insured. The joint motion of Cello-Foil Products, Inc., Gelman Sciences, Inc., Arco Industries Corporation, and Frederick C. Matthaei, Jr., for consolidation is treated as a motion for joint submission and it is granted. This case is to be argued and submitted with Gelman Sciences Inc v. Fidelity Casualty Co, No. 105981, and Arco Industries Corp v. American Motorists Ins Co, No. 106678. Leave to file briefs amici curiae is also granted. Leave to cross appeal is denied.
Court of Appeals No. 151615.
204 N.W.2d 38 PEOPLE v. RAY Docket No. 12187.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided September 27,…
562 N.W.2d 224 DETROIT EDISON COMPANY v PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION Docket Nos. 177054, 177055, 177062,…
376 N.W.2d 176 PEOPLE v BUTTS Docket No. 80186.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided August 5,…
223 N.W.2d 652 PEOPLE v ZUNIGA Docket No. 17453.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided October 21,…
308 N.W.2d 176 PEOPLE v SIDNEY SMITH Docket No. 50618.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided March…
545 N.W.2d 18 PEOPLE v McELHANEY Docket No. 162330.Michigan Court of Appeals.Submitted November 15, 1995,…