Categories: Michigan Supreme Court Opinions

CHURELLA v. PIONEER STATE MUT. INS. CO., 465 Mich. 874 (2001)

634 N.W.2d 359

MARK CHURELLA, SUSAN RADTKE and PETER TREBOLDI, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. PIONEER STATE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, DALE LITTLE, GORDON H. GINGRICH, HARLAN GINGRICH, ROBERT WEST, DAN CZMER, JACK D’ARCY, CARLETON WILSON and MILTON TIMMERMAN, Defendants, and ATTORNEY GENERAL and COMMISSIONER OF INSURANCE, Intervening Defendants-Appellants, and NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANIES, Intervening Defendant.

No. 119761 (103)(104).Supreme Court of Michigan.
September 18, 2001.

COA: 204840, Wayne CC: 96-635359-CZ

On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is considered and it is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal from the May 21, 2001 decision of the Court of Appeals and the motion for stay are considered, and they are DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

jdjungle