CITY OF TAYLOR v. THE DETROIT EDISON COMPANY, 474 Mich. 877 (2005)

704 N.W.2d 75

CITY OF TAYLOR v. THE DETROIT EDISON COMPANY.

No. 127580.Supreme Court of Michigan.
October 6, 2005.

Leave to Appeal Granted.

SC: 127580.

The parties shall address what powers the city has over utilities under its constitutional authority to exercise reasonable control over its streets, whether that authority invariably allows the city to shift the costs of relocation of utility equipment to the utility, and how the city’s constitutional authority should be reconciled with the Michigan Public Service Commission’s broad authority to regulate utilities. The motions for leave to file briefs amicus curiae are also considered, and they are granted. Reported below:263 Mich App 551.

jdjungle

Share
Published by
jdjungle

Recent Posts

PEOPLE v. RAY, 43 Mich. App. 45 (1972)

204 N.W.2d 38 PEOPLE v. RAY Docket No. 12187.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided September 27,…

9 years ago

DETROIT EDISON v. PSC, 221 Mich. App. 370 (1997)

562 N.W.2d 224 DETROIT EDISON COMPANY v PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION Docket Nos. 177054, 177055, 177062,…

9 years ago

PEOPLE v. BUTTS, 144 Mich. App. 637 (1985)

376 N.W.2d 176 PEOPLE v BUTTS Docket No. 80186.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided August 5,…

9 years ago

PEOPLE v. ZUNIGA, 56 Mich. App. 231 (1974)

223 N.W.2d 652 PEOPLE v ZUNIGA Docket No. 17453.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided October 21,…

9 years ago

PEOPLE v. SIDNEY SMITH, 106 Mich. App. 310 (1981)

308 N.W.2d 176 PEOPLE v SIDNEY SMITH Docket No. 50618.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided March…

9 years ago

PEOPLE v. McELHANEY, 215 Mich. App. 269 (1996)

545 N.W.2d 18 PEOPLE v McELHANEY Docket No. 162330.Michigan Court of Appeals.Submitted November 15, 1995,…

9 years ago