COGENT SYS. v. MICH. DEPT. OF MGMT. AND BUDGET, 464 Mich. 864 (2001)

627 N.W.2d 606

COGENT SYSTEMS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET, DIRECTOR OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET, and DIRECTOR OF OFFICE OF PURCHASING, MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET, Defendants-Appellees, and SAGEM MORPHO, INC., Intervening-Defendant-Appellee.

No. 119009-10 (30)(31).Supreme Court of Michigan.
May 30, 2001.

COA: 232691, 232765

Ingham CC: 00-092758-AA

On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration, the application for leave to appeal from the March 22, 2001, order of the Court of Appeals, and the motion to grant immediate effect to the Court of Appeals order are considered. The motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion to grant immediate effect to the Court of Appeals order is moot and is therefore DISMISSED.

jdjungle

Share
Published by
jdjungle

Recent Posts

PEOPLE v. RAY, 43 Mich. App. 45 (1972)

204 N.W.2d 38 PEOPLE v. RAY Docket No. 12187.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided September 27,…

9 years ago

DETROIT EDISON v. PSC, 221 Mich. App. 370 (1997)

562 N.W.2d 224 DETROIT EDISON COMPANY v PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION Docket Nos. 177054, 177055, 177062,…

9 years ago

PEOPLE v. BUTTS, 144 Mich. App. 637 (1985)

376 N.W.2d 176 PEOPLE v BUTTS Docket No. 80186.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided August 5,…

9 years ago

PEOPLE v. ZUNIGA, 56 Mich. App. 231 (1974)

223 N.W.2d 652 PEOPLE v ZUNIGA Docket No. 17453.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided October 21,…

9 years ago

PEOPLE v. SIDNEY SMITH, 106 Mich. App. 310 (1981)

308 N.W.2d 176 PEOPLE v SIDNEY SMITH Docket No. 50618.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided March…

9 years ago

PEOPLE v. McELHANEY, 215 Mich. App. 269 (1996)

545 N.W.2d 18 PEOPLE v McELHANEY Docket No. 162330.Michigan Court of Appeals.Submitted November 15, 1995,…

9 years ago