CROUCHMAN v. MOTOR CITY ELECTRIC COMPANY, 474 Mich. 873 (2005)

704 N.W.2d 75

No. 127871.Supreme Court of Michigan.
September 29, 2005.

SC: 127871.

Pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), we direct the clerk to schedule oral argument on whether to grant the application or take other peremptory action

Page 874

permitted by MCR 7.302(G)(1). The parties shall include among the issues to be addressed at oral argument whether the Court of Appeals erred in concluding that there is coverage where the automobile involved in the accident is not owned by the insured but is furnished to, or available for regular use by the insured. The parties may file supplemental briefs within 28 days of the date of this order, but they should avoid submitting mere restatements of arguments in application papers. Court of Appeals No. 248419.