Categories: Michigan Supreme Court Opinions

CROWDER v. BORCHERDING, 468 Mich. 858 (2003)

658 N.W.2d 483

NICHOLAS R. CROWDER and ERIC R. CROWDER, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. ALAN K. BORCHERDING, B B INVESTMENTS GROUP, ROBERT H. ROETHER, STEVE SOWELL, and DAVID G. MYERS, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 123161 (13)(16).Supreme Court of Michigan.
February 28, 2003.

COA: 245924, Oakland CC: 2002-039588-CZ

On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is considered, and it is GRANTED. The motion to consolidate is considered, and it is DENIED. The application for leave to appeal prior to decision by the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED as moot, in light of the February 6, 2003 decision of the Court of Appeals. The supplemental application for leave to appeal from the February 6, 2003 decision of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

jdjungle