Categories: Michigan Supreme Court Opinions

DANIEL v. DEARBORN INDUSTRIAL GENERATION, LLC, 468 Mich. 858 (2003)

658 N.W.2d 484

DUKE FLUOR DANIEL, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DEARBORN INDUSTRIAL GENERATION, LLC, Defendant-Appellant, and ROUGE STEEL COMPANY, FORD MOTOR COMPANY, CONGRESS FINANCIAL CORPORATION, DOUBLE EAGLE STEEL COATING COMPANY, UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION, and ROUGE STEEL COMPANY; L.K. COMSTOCK COMPANY, INC., BANC ONE LEASING CORPORATION, MICRON ELECTRICAL CONTRACTING, INC., E.L.S. CONSTRUCTION, INC., and WALBRIDGE ALDINGER COMPANY, Defendants.

No. 122201 (26).Supreme Court of Michigan.
February 28, 2003.

COA: 241302, Wayne CC: 01-135164-CH

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal from the August 2, 2002 decision of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should now be reviewed by this Court. The motion to hold application in abeyance is also considered, and it is DENIED as moot.

jdjungle