Categories: Michigan Supreme Court Opinions

DOW CORNING CORPORATION v. CONTINENTAL CAS. CO., 463 Mich. 854 (2000)

617 N.W.2d 554

DOW CORNING CORPORATION and DOW CORNING WRIGHT CORPORATION, Realigned Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY, INC., et al, Realigned Defendants-Appellants, and ACE INSURANCE CO., et al, Defendants.

No. 116178-189 (128)(129)(134).Supreme Court of Michigan.
August 22, 2000.

Appeal from COA: 200143-154, Michigan, Wayne CC: 93-325788-CK.

On order of the Court, the request for judicial notice, the motion to substitute attorneys, the motion for leave to file amicus curiae brief and the application for leave to appeal from the October 12, 1999 decision of the Court of Appeals are considered. The request for judicial notice, the motion to substitute attorneys, and the motion for leave to file amicus curiae brief are GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal is DENIED because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

Young, Jr., J., not participating.

jdjungle