FRANCHISE MGMT. UNL. v. AMERICA’S FAV. CHICKEN, 108904 (Mich. 5-7-1999)

595 N.W.2d 843

FRANCHISE MANAGEMENT UNLIMITED, INC., ROGER BURNEY and ROGERS CLARK, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. AMERICA’S FAVORITE CHICKEN, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 108904.Supreme Court of Michigan.
May 7, 1999.

On order of the Court, the motion by the Attorney General for leave to file an answer as amicus curiae to the motion for reconsideration is GRANTED. The motion for reconsideration of the order of March 8, 1999 is considered, and it is DENIED because it does not appear the order was entered erroneously.

Cavanagh and Kelly, JJ., would grant reconsideration.

Taylor and Young, Jr., not participating.

jdjungle

Share
Published by
jdjungle

Recent Posts

PEOPLE v. RAY, 43 Mich. App. 45 (1972)

204 N.W.2d 38 PEOPLE v. RAY Docket No. 12187.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided September 27,…

9 years ago

DETROIT EDISON v. PSC, 221 Mich. App. 370 (1997)

562 N.W.2d 224 DETROIT EDISON COMPANY v PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION Docket Nos. 177054, 177055, 177062,…

9 years ago

PEOPLE v. BUTTS, 144 Mich. App. 637 (1985)

376 N.W.2d 176 PEOPLE v BUTTS Docket No. 80186.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided August 5,…

9 years ago

PEOPLE v. ZUNIGA, 56 Mich. App. 231 (1974)

223 N.W.2d 652 PEOPLE v ZUNIGA Docket No. 17453.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided October 21,…

9 years ago

PEOPLE v. SIDNEY SMITH, 106 Mich. App. 310 (1981)

308 N.W.2d 176 PEOPLE v SIDNEY SMITH Docket No. 50618.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided March…

9 years ago

PEOPLE v. McELHANEY, 215 Mich. App. 269 (1996)

545 N.W.2d 18 PEOPLE v McELHANEY Docket No. 162330.Michigan Court of Appeals.Submitted November 15, 1995,…

9 years ago