No. 72823.Supreme Court of Michigan.
February 7, 1984.
Pursuant to GCR 1963, 853.2(4), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, the order of the Attorney Discipline Board dated September 30, 1983, is modified to the extent that it bars the respondent during his period of suspension from working as an “agent, clerk or employee” of a licensed attorney. Insofar as those activities do not require a license to practice law in Michigan, prohibiting respondent from engaging in those activities as a part of his suspension exceeds the board’s power of suspension pursuant to GCR 1963, 955(2). In all other respects leave to appeal is denied.
Albert A. Chappell, in propria persona, respondent-appellant.
Michael Alan Schwartz, Grievance Administrator, and William E. Lang, Associate Counsel, Attorney Grievance Commission, for petitioner-appellee.
WILLIAMS, C.J., not participating.
204 N.W.2d 38 PEOPLE v. RAY Docket No. 12187.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided September 27,…
562 N.W.2d 224 DETROIT EDISON COMPANY v PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION Docket Nos. 177054, 177055, 177062,…
376 N.W.2d 176 PEOPLE v BUTTS Docket No. 80186.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided August 5,…
223 N.W.2d 652 PEOPLE v ZUNIGA Docket No. 17453.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided October 21,…
308 N.W.2d 176 PEOPLE v SIDNEY SMITH Docket No. 50618.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided March…
545 N.W.2d 18 PEOPLE v McELHANEY Docket No. 162330.Michigan Court of Appeals.Submitted November 15, 1995,…