No. 135686.Supreme Court of Michigan.
May 30, 2008.
Court of Appeals No. 274059.
Leave to Appeal Denied May 30, 2008.
Page 886
MARKMAN, J. (concurring in part and dissenting in part.)
With regard to the `failure to promote’ claim, I would reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeals and reinstate the trial court’s order granting defendant’s motion for summary disposition for the reasons stated in part II of the Court of Appeals dissenting opinion. I would affirm the judgment of the Court of Appeals on the `hostile environment’ claim.
204 N.W.2d 38 PEOPLE v. RAY Docket No. 12187.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided September 27,…
562 N.W.2d 224 DETROIT EDISON COMPANY v PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION Docket Nos. 177054, 177055, 177062,…
376 N.W.2d 176 PEOPLE v BUTTS Docket No. 80186.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided August 5,…
223 N.W.2d 652 PEOPLE v ZUNIGA Docket No. 17453.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided October 21,…
308 N.W.2d 176 PEOPLE v SIDNEY SMITH Docket No. 50618.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided March…
545 N.W.2d 18 PEOPLE v McELHANEY Docket No. 162330.Michigan Court of Appeals.Submitted November 15, 1995,…