554 N.W.2d 903

HEINZ v. AUTO CLUB INSURANCE ASSOCIATION.

No. 104931.Supreme Court of Michigan.
October 22, 1996.

Leave to Appeal Denied October 22, 1996:

In the trial court defendant did not substantively oppose the relief now at issue, nor did it attempt to discern which guardianship fees and expenses were related to authorization to obtain medical treatment for the ward. Reported below: 214 Mich. App. 195.

Reconsideration denied January 31, 1997.

BOYLE, J.

I would direct that the Court of Appeals opinion have no precedential force or effect for the following reasons: (a) There is no breakdown of figures allowable to various services; and (b) the Court of Appeals opinion is binding and will be broadly read to cover all expenses of a personal representative including all attorney fees.

Tagged: