617 N.W.2d 333
No. 116642 (4).Supreme Court of Michigan.
August 8, 2000.
By order of May 16, 2000, the complaint for superintending control and the motion for a stay were considered and taken under advisement.
On order of the Court, comparable relief having been granted by Administrative Orders 2000-2 and 2000-5, the complaint for superintending control is DISMISSED. The motion for a stay is DENIED as moot.
204 N.W.2d 38 PEOPLE v. RAY Docket No. 12187.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided September 27,…
562 N.W.2d 224 DETROIT EDISON COMPANY v PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION Docket Nos. 177054, 177055, 177062,…
376 N.W.2d 176 PEOPLE v BUTTS Docket No. 80186.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided August 5,…
223 N.W.2d 652 PEOPLE v ZUNIGA Docket No. 17453.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided October 21,…
308 N.W.2d 176 PEOPLE v SIDNEY SMITH Docket No. 50618.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided March…
545 N.W.2d 18 PEOPLE v McELHANEY Docket No. 162330.Michigan Court of Appeals.Submitted November 15, 1995,…