IN RE PROPOSED AMENDMENT, 482 Mich. 1201 (2008)

PROPOSED AMENDMENT OF RULE 2.614 OF THE MICHIGAN COURT RULES.

Supreme Court of Michigan.
September 16, 2008.

Special Orders Order Entered September 16, 2008.

On order of the Court, this is to advise that the Court is considering an amendment of Rule 2.614 of the Michigan Court Rules. Before determining whether the proposal should be adopted, changed before adoption, or rejected, this notice is given to afford interested persons the opportunity to comment on the form or the merits of the proposal or to suggest alternatives. The Court welcomes the views of all. This matter also will be considered at a public hearing. The notices and agendas for public hearings are posted at www.courts.michigan.gov/supremecourt.

Publication of this proposal does not mean that the Court will issue an order on the subject, nor does it imply probable adoption of the proposal in its present form.

Page 1202

[The present language would be amended as indicated below:]
RULE 2.614. STAY OF PROCEEDINGS TO ENFORCE JUDGMENT.

(A) Automatic Stay; Exceptions: Injunctions, Receiverships, and Family Litigation.

(1) Except as provided in this rule, execution may not issue on a judgment and proceedings may not be taken for its enforcement until the expiration of 21 days after its entry. If a motion for new trial, a motion to alter or amend the judgment, amotion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, or a motion toamend or for additional findings of the court forrehearing or reconsideration, or a motion for other relief fromjudgment is filed and served within 21 days after entry of the judgment or within further time the trial court hasallowed for good cause during that 21-day period, execution may not issue on the judgment and proceedings may not be taken for its enforcement until the expiration of 21 days after the entry of the order on deciding the motion, unless otherwise ordered by the court on motion for good cause. Nothing in this rule prohibits the court from enjoining the transfer or disposition of property during the 21-day period.

(2)-(3) [Unchanged.] (B)-(G)[Unchanged.]

Staff Comment: The proposed amendments of MCR 2.614 are intended to make the rule consistent with recent amendments of MCR 2.119, 7.204, and 7.205, adopted May 28, 2008, and effective September 1, 2008, which clarified that a party who seeks to appeal to the Court of Appeals has 21 days after the entry of an order deciding a motion for new trial, a motion for rehearing or reconsideration, or a motion for other relief from the order or judgment appealed, to file a claim of appeal or an application for leave to appeal, if the motion is filed within the initial 21-day appeal period, or within further time the trial court has allowed for good cause during that 21-day period.

The staff comment is not an authoritative construction by the Court.

A copy of this order will be given to the Secretary of the State Bar and to the State Court Administrator so that they can make the notifications specified in MCR 1.201. Comments on these proposals may be sent to the Supreme Court Clerk in writing or electronically by January 1, 2009, at P.O. Box 30052, Lansing, MI 48909, or MSC_clerk@courts.mi.gov. When filing a comment, please refer to ADM File No. 2008-24. Your comments and the comments of others will be posted at www.courts.mi.gov/supremecourt/resources/administrative/index.htm.