549 N.W.2d 320
No. 103411.Supreme Court of Michigan.
May 10, 1996.
Leave to Appeal Denied May 10, 1996:
Court of Appeals No. 158358.
LEVIN, J.
I would grant leave to appeal to consider whether, as stated by the dissenting Court of Appeals judge, “the factual determination of the parties’ intentions should have been left to the trier of fact. Stitt v Mahaney, 403 Mich. 711, 718; 272 N.W.2d 526 (1978).”
BOYLE and MALLETT, JJ.
We would grant leave to appeal.
204 N.W.2d 38 PEOPLE v. RAY Docket No. 12187.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided September 27,…
562 N.W.2d 224 DETROIT EDISON COMPANY v PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION Docket Nos. 177054, 177055, 177062,…
376 N.W.2d 176 PEOPLE v BUTTS Docket No. 80186.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided August 5,…
223 N.W.2d 652 PEOPLE v ZUNIGA Docket No. 17453.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided October 21,…
308 N.W.2d 176 PEOPLE v SIDNEY SMITH Docket No. 50618.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided March…
545 N.W.2d 18 PEOPLE v McELHANEY Docket No. 162330.Michigan Court of Appeals.Submitted November 15, 1995,…