Categories: Michigan Supreme Court Opinions

MANISTEE COUNTY ROAD COMM. v. NORTHWOODS DEVELOPMENT, 472 Mich. 854 (2005)

691 N.W.2d 458

MANISTEE COUNTY ROAD COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. NORTHWOODS DEVELOPMENT, LLC, Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant, and ONEKAMA TOWNSHIP, DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER INDUSTRY SERVICES, and DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES, Third-Party Defendants-Appellees, and MANISTEE COUNTY DRAIN COMMISSIONER, CONSUMERS ENERGY COMPANY, AMERITECH, ALLAN AND CATHERINE DOMRES, MARY JANE CLARK SWANSON, EVELYN SORENSON TRUST, THOMAS W. CAREY, JR., PORTAGE POINT DEVELOPMENT, and PORTAGE POINT CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, Third-Party Defendants, and ALBERT HERZOG, JUDITH HERZOG, DANIEL MONAHAN, SANDRA MONAHAN, RICHARD S. FORWOOD LIVING TRUST, RICHARD S. FORWOOD, SHARON OLSON, DANIEL OLSON, ANN M. DILLON, ADAMS FAMILY TRUST, HILDEGARD ADAMS, EARL ADAMS, EVELYN LYSETT SORENSON TRUST, EVELYN L. SORENSON, BARBARA L. VANDERVEEN REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST, BARBARA L. VANDERVEEN, PETER VANDERVEEN, ANN S. WHELAN TRUST, JOHN T. WHELAN, ANN S. WHELAN, DONALD WIPER, SALLY WIPER, JOHN P. HERZOG, SUSAN B. HERZOG, ALFRED A. TURNER, SUSAN TURNER, and GAIL DRAKE, Intervening Appellees.

No. 126471.Supreme Court of Michigan.
January 28, 2005.

SC: 126471, COA: 243971, Manistee CC: 96-008236-CH.

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 25, 2004 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

jdjungle