654 N.W.2d 327
No. 120292.Supreme Court of Michigan.
October 30, 2002.
COA: 213957, Ingham CC: 96-083519-NZ
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal from the August 7, 2001 decision of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is GRANTED, limited to whether that Court erred by holding that other employees were not comparable to plaintiff because they were hired by different plants or by a different supervisor at the Lansing plant. In addition, the parties are directed to brief the question whether Michigan should adopt the test of comparability as enunciated in Mitchell v Toledo Hosp, 964 F.2d 577, 583 (CA 6, 1992).
Kelly, J., would deny leave to appeal.
204 N.W.2d 38 PEOPLE v. RAY Docket No. 12187.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided September 27,…
562 N.W.2d 224 DETROIT EDISON COMPANY v PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION Docket Nos. 177054, 177055, 177062,…
376 N.W.2d 176 PEOPLE v BUTTS Docket No. 80186.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided August 5,…
223 N.W.2d 652 PEOPLE v ZUNIGA Docket No. 17453.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided October 21,…
308 N.W.2d 176 PEOPLE v SIDNEY SMITH Docket No. 50618.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided March…
545 N.W.2d 18 PEOPLE v McELHANEY Docket No. 162330.Michigan Court of Appeals.Submitted November 15, 1995,…