638 N.W.2d 752
No. 117741 (8).Supreme Court of Michigan.
December 21, 2001.
SC: 117741
Plaintiff filed a complaint for mandamus and this Court, by order of May 25, 2001, directed the parties to provide the Court certain information. The parties have complied with that directive. By further order dated September 18, 2001, this Court directed defendant to exercise its discretion under Rule 7 of the Board of Law Examiners concerning plaintiff’s request that it waive the requirement that he possess a degree from a reputable and qualified law school. Defendant has complied with that directive and determined that plaintiff has made an adequate showing for a waiver of the requirement. On order of the Court, the complaint for mandamus is again considered, and, it is DISMISSED as moot.
204 N.W.2d 38 PEOPLE v. RAY Docket No. 12187.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided September 27,…
562 N.W.2d 224 DETROIT EDISON COMPANY v PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION Docket Nos. 177054, 177055, 177062,…
376 N.W.2d 176 PEOPLE v BUTTS Docket No. 80186.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided August 5,…
223 N.W.2d 652 PEOPLE v ZUNIGA Docket No. 17453.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided October 21,…
308 N.W.2d 176 PEOPLE v SIDNEY SMITH Docket No. 50618.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided March…
545 N.W.2d 18 PEOPLE v McELHANEY Docket No. 162330.Michigan Court of Appeals.Submitted November 15, 1995,…