MEGLEY v. BOARD OF LAW EXAMINERS, 117741 (Mich. 12-21-2001)

638 N.W.2d 752

KEVIN B. MEGLEY, Plaintiff, v. BOARD OF LAW EXAMINERS, Defendant.

No. 117741 (8).Supreme Court of Michigan.
December 21, 2001.

SC: 117741

Plaintiff filed a complaint for mandamus and this Court, by order of May 25, 2001, directed the parties to provide the Court certain information. The parties have complied with that directive. By further order dated September 18, 2001, this Court directed defendant to exercise its discretion under Rule 7 of the Board of Law Examiners concerning plaintiff’s request that it waive the requirement that he possess a degree from a reputable and qualified law school. Defendant has complied with that directive and determined that plaintiff has made an adequate showing for a waiver of the requirement. On order of the Court, the complaint for mandamus is again considered, and, it is DISMISSED as moot.

jdjungle

Share
Published by
jdjungle

Recent Posts

PEOPLE v. RAY, 43 Mich. App. 45 (1972)

204 N.W.2d 38 PEOPLE v. RAY Docket No. 12187.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided September 27,…

9 years ago

DETROIT EDISON v. PSC, 221 Mich. App. 370 (1997)

562 N.W.2d 224 DETROIT EDISON COMPANY v PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION Docket Nos. 177054, 177055, 177062,…

9 years ago

PEOPLE v. BUTTS, 144 Mich. App. 637 (1985)

376 N.W.2d 176 PEOPLE v BUTTS Docket No. 80186.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided August 5,…

9 years ago

PEOPLE v. ZUNIGA, 56 Mich. App. 231 (1974)

223 N.W.2d 652 PEOPLE v ZUNIGA Docket No. 17453.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided October 21,…

9 years ago

PEOPLE v. SIDNEY SMITH, 106 Mich. App. 310 (1981)

308 N.W.2d 176 PEOPLE v SIDNEY SMITH Docket No. 50618.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided March…

9 years ago

PEOPLE v. McELHANEY, 215 Mich. App. 269 (1996)

545 N.W.2d 18 PEOPLE v McELHANEY Docket No. 162330.Michigan Court of Appeals.Submitted November 15, 1995,…

9 years ago