650 N.W.2d 327
No. 122283 (18).Supreme Court of Michigan.
September 10, 2002.
COA: 243506
On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal from the September 6, 2002, decision of the Court of Appeals, is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Kelly, J., concurring:
I concur. But for the time constraints governing this matter, I would grant leave to consider whether this Court possesses the authority to order correction of the technical error that prevents this proposal from appearing on the ballot.
204 N.W.2d 38 PEOPLE v. RAY Docket No. 12187.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided September 27,…
562 N.W.2d 224 DETROIT EDISON COMPANY v PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION Docket Nos. 177054, 177055, 177062,…
376 N.W.2d 176 PEOPLE v BUTTS Docket No. 80186.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided August 5,…
223 N.W.2d 652 PEOPLE v ZUNIGA Docket No. 17453.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided October 21,…
308 N.W.2d 176 PEOPLE v SIDNEY SMITH Docket No. 50618.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided March…
545 N.W.2d 18 PEOPLE v McELHANEY Docket No. 162330.Michigan Court of Appeals.Submitted November 15, 1995,…