Categories: Michigan Supreme Court Opinions

OLSEN v. CITY OF WESTLAND, 461 Mich. 868 (1999)

603 N.W.2d 262

ROBERTA OLSEN, TIMOTHY OLSEN, ET AL, CHERYL BATES, WILLIAM BATES, ET AL, RONALD CROOKS, NANCY CROOKS, and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF WESTLAND and JOHN DOE REPRESENTATIVES, EMPLOYEES, OR AGENTS OF THE CITY OF WESTLAND, LANZO CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, PETER A. BASILE SONS, INC., ORCHARD, HILTZ McCLIMENT, INC., Defendants, and CITY OF WESTLAND, Defendant/Cross-Plaintiff/Appellee, v. LANZO CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Defendant/Cross-Defendant, and PETER BASILE SONS, INC., Defendant/Cross-Defendant/Appellant.

Nos. SC: 113800, 113801, 113802.Supreme Court of Michigan.
September 22, 1999.

On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is considered, and it is DENIED. The application for leave to appeal from the December 11, 1998, December 17, 1998, and December 22, 1998 decisions of the Court of Appeals is also considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should now be reviewed by this Court.

Court of Appeals No. 215027-215029.

jdjungle