636 N.W.2d 134
ORSCO, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ACUMEN TECHNOLOGIES, INC., CLIFFORD S. WILLNER, RUSSELL P. DIPPEL, JR., KENNETH G. BAUSWELL and KEVIN C. VALLIE, Defendants-Counter-Claimants-Appellants, and DEBORAH A. WILLNER and LINDA M. DIPPEL, Additional Plaintiffs on the Counter-Claim-Appellants, v. ORSCO, INC., Counter-Defendant-Appellee, and PATRICK L. JEAKLE and MARY KAY JEAKLE, Additional Defendants on the Counter-Claim-Appellees.
No. 118360.Supreme Court of Michigan.
September 25, 2001.
COA: 228301, Macomb CC: 98-000412-CZ
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal from the October 23, 2000 decision of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should now be reviewed by this Court.
