No. 138048.Supreme Court of Michigan.
May 28, 2009.
Court of Appeals No. 286641.
Summary Disposition.
Pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we remand this case to the Court of Appeals for consideration as on leave granted. The record indicates that the defendant, through counsel, attempted to submit a timely request for appointment of appellate counsel, but through misunderstanding or error, the Wayne Circuit Court refused to accept it. Had the court accepted the form and ruled on the request for appellate counsel within 14 days, as required by MCR 6.425(G)(1)(a), and then submitted a copy of the appointment order and judgment of sentence to the Court of Appeals, as required by MCR 6.425(G)(3), the defendant’s appeal of right would have been preserved.
We further direct the Court of Appeals to remand this case first to the Wayne Circuit Court, in accordance with Administrative Order No. 2003-3, so that the circuit court can determine whether the defendant is indigent and, if so, to appoint counsel to represent the defendant in the Court of Appeals. Appellate counsel, if one is appointed, shall review the new issues raised by the defendant in his supplemental brief filed in this Court before filing an appeal brief in the Court of Appeals on remand.
204 N.W.2d 38 PEOPLE v. RAY Docket No. 12187.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided September 27,…
562 N.W.2d 224 DETROIT EDISON COMPANY v PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION Docket Nos. 177054, 177055, 177062,…
376 N.W.2d 176 PEOPLE v BUTTS Docket No. 80186.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided August 5,…
223 N.W.2d 652 PEOPLE v ZUNIGA Docket No. 17453.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided October 21,…
308 N.W.2d 176 PEOPLE v SIDNEY SMITH Docket No. 50618.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided March…
545 N.W.2d 18 PEOPLE v McELHANEY Docket No. 162330.Michigan Court of Appeals.Submitted November 15, 1995,…