603 N.W.2d 783
No. 112659.Supreme Court of Michigan.
November 2, 1999.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal from the July 2, 1998 decision of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is GRANTED. The parties shall include among the issues to be briefed whether the alleged error in the waiver of counsel process amounted to a jurisdictional defect so as to satisfy MCR 6.508(D)(3), and whether, if so, an issue of jurisdictional significance can be subject to harmless error analysis.
Court of Appeals No. 208643.
204 N.W.2d 38 PEOPLE v. RAY Docket No. 12187.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided September 27,…
562 N.W.2d 224 DETROIT EDISON COMPANY v PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION Docket Nos. 177054, 177055, 177062,…
376 N.W.2d 176 PEOPLE v BUTTS Docket No. 80186.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided August 5,…
223 N.W.2d 652 PEOPLE v ZUNIGA Docket No. 17453.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided October 21,…
308 N.W.2d 176 PEOPLE v SIDNEY SMITH Docket No. 50618.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided March…
545 N.W.2d 18 PEOPLE v McELHANEY Docket No. 162330.Michigan Court of Appeals.Submitted November 15, 1995,…