No. 104170.Supreme Court of Michigan.
June 11, 1996.
Summary to Dispositions June 11, 1996:
In lieu of granting leave to appeal, the case is remanded to the trial court for a hearing to determine whether the statement made by defendant on the morning after his arrest should have been suppressed, for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals. Jurisdiction is retained. MCR 7.302(F)(1).
Court of Appeals No. 164247.
204 N.W.2d 38 PEOPLE v. RAY Docket No. 12187.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided September 27,…
562 N.W.2d 224 DETROIT EDISON COMPANY v PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION Docket Nos. 177054, 177055, 177062,…
376 N.W.2d 176 PEOPLE v BUTTS Docket No. 80186.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided August 5,…
223 N.W.2d 652 PEOPLE v ZUNIGA Docket No. 17453.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided October 21,…
308 N.W.2d 176 PEOPLE v SIDNEY SMITH Docket No. 50618.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided March…
545 N.W.2d 18 PEOPLE v McELHANEY Docket No. 162330.Michigan Court of Appeals.Submitted November 15, 1995,…