644 N.W.2d 762
No. 120009.Supreme Court of Michigan.
May 7, 2002.
COA: 229827, Genesee CC: 98-003561-FC
On order of the court, the delayed application for leave to appeal from the July 25, 2001 decision of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED because we are not persuaded that the question should be reviewed.
CAVANAGH, J., would remand this case to the trial court for a correction of the presentence report in accordance with the trial court’s order granting the defendant’s motion to correct the presentence report if it is determined that the inaccurate information has not been deleted.
204 N.W.2d 38 PEOPLE v. RAY Docket No. 12187.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided September 27,…
562 N.W.2d 224 DETROIT EDISON COMPANY v PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION Docket Nos. 177054, 177055, 177062,…
376 N.W.2d 176 PEOPLE v BUTTS Docket No. 80186.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided August 5,…
223 N.W.2d 652 PEOPLE v ZUNIGA Docket No. 17453.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided October 21,…
308 N.W.2d 176 PEOPLE v SIDNEY SMITH Docket No. 50618.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided March…
545 N.W.2d 18 PEOPLE v McELHANEY Docket No. 162330.Michigan Court of Appeals.Submitted November 15, 1995,…