728 N.W.2d 873
No. 132250.Supreme Court of Michigan.
April 4, 2007.
Appeal from the Court of Appeals No. 268628.
Summary Dispositions April 4, 2007.
Pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we remand this case to the Court of Appeals for consideration as on leave granted. The Court of Appeals shall include among the issues to be considered: (1) whether the Court of Appeals, on direct appeal, erred in failing to apply the “harmless beyond a reasonable doubt” standard that is applied to preserved federal constitutional error, Chapman v California, 386 US 18 (1967); (2) if so, whether the errors committed at trial were harmless beyond a reasonable doubt; and (3) whether the defendant is entitled to postappeal relief under MCR 6.508(D)(3). We do not retain jurisdiction.
Page 1067
204 N.W.2d 38 PEOPLE v. RAY Docket No. 12187.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided September 27,…
562 N.W.2d 224 DETROIT EDISON COMPANY v PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION Docket Nos. 177054, 177055, 177062,…
376 N.W.2d 176 PEOPLE v BUTTS Docket No. 80186.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided August 5,…
223 N.W.2d 652 PEOPLE v ZUNIGA Docket No. 17453.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided October 21,…
308 N.W.2d 176 PEOPLE v SIDNEY SMITH Docket No. 50618.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided March…
545 N.W.2d 18 PEOPLE v McELHANEY Docket No. 162330.Michigan Court of Appeals.Submitted November 15, 1995,…