607 N.W.2d 366
No. 114632 (18).Supreme Court of Michigan.
January 11, 2000.
On order of the Court, the motion to file an amended application for leave to appeal is GRANTED. The delayed application for leave to appeal the January 14, 1999 decision of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Cavanagh and Kelly, JJ., state as follows:
We would remand this case to the Court of Appeals for consideration of the defendant’s application for leave to appeal. For purposes of the time limit in MCR 7.205(F)(3), the dispositive order was the September 22, 1997 order that denied the defendant’s combined motion and memorandum to set aside denial of the motion for relief from judgment.
Court of Appeals No. 214509.
Page 946
204 N.W.2d 38 PEOPLE v. RAY Docket No. 12187.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided September 27,…
562 N.W.2d 224 DETROIT EDISON COMPANY v PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION Docket Nos. 177054, 177055, 177062,…
376 N.W.2d 176 PEOPLE v BUTTS Docket No. 80186.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided August 5,…
223 N.W.2d 652 PEOPLE v ZUNIGA Docket No. 17453.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided October 21,…
308 N.W.2d 176 PEOPLE v SIDNEY SMITH Docket No. 50618.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided March…
545 N.W.2d 18 PEOPLE v McELHANEY Docket No. 162330.Michigan Court of Appeals.Submitted November 15, 1995,…