679 N.W.2d 41
No. 124160.Supreme Court of Michigan.
May 7, 2004.
SC: 124160, COA: 248237, Kalkaska CC: 02-002219-FH.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 8, 2003 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. See People v. Perks (On Remand), 259 Mich. App. 100 (2003), lv. den. 469 Mich. 1022
(2004).
Corrigan C.J., dissents and states as follows:
I respectfully dissent from the order denying leave to appeal. I adhere to the views expressed in my previous concurring statement in People v. Perks, 469 Mich. 864 (2003).
Page 864
204 N.W.2d 38 PEOPLE v. RAY Docket No. 12187.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided September 27,…
562 N.W.2d 224 DETROIT EDISON COMPANY v PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION Docket Nos. 177054, 177055, 177062,…
376 N.W.2d 176 PEOPLE v BUTTS Docket No. 80186.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided August 5,…
223 N.W.2d 652 PEOPLE v ZUNIGA Docket No. 17453.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided October 21,…
308 N.W.2d 176 PEOPLE v SIDNEY SMITH Docket No. 50618.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided March…
545 N.W.2d 18 PEOPLE v McELHANEY Docket No. 162330.Michigan Court of Appeals.Submitted November 15, 1995,…