No. 135048.Supreme Court of Michigan.
December 5, 2007.
Court of Appeals No. 277870.
Summary Dispositions December 5, 2007:
Pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we remand this case to the Court of Appeals for consideration as on leave granted. On remand, the Court of Appeals may, at its option, remand to the trial court for further proceedings, e.g., for factual determinations concerning the reasonable and customary hourly fees paid to experts of the type sought by the defendant, the hourly fees paid to the proposed defense expert by the prosecution in prior cases, and whether the fee cap set in this case effectively precludes the defendant from access to an expert witness. We further order that the trial not occur until the completion of this appeal. We do not retain jurisdiction.
204 N.W.2d 38 PEOPLE v. RAY Docket No. 12187.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided September 27,…
562 N.W.2d 224 DETROIT EDISON COMPANY v PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION Docket Nos. 177054, 177055, 177062,…
376 N.W.2d 176 PEOPLE v BUTTS Docket No. 80186.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided August 5,…
223 N.W.2d 652 PEOPLE v ZUNIGA Docket No. 17453.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided October 21,…
308 N.W.2d 176 PEOPLE v SIDNEY SMITH Docket No. 50618.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided March…
545 N.W.2d 18 PEOPLE v McELHANEY Docket No. 162330.Michigan Court of Appeals.Submitted November 15, 1995,…