605 N.W.2d 320
No. 114481.Supreme Court of Michigan.
December 7, 1999.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal from the March 30, 1999 decision of the Court of Appeals is considered and, in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals as on leave granted to consider whether enforcement of the state requirement concerning flotation devices on watercraft is preempted by a similar tribal regulation and whether enforcement of the flotation device requirement against a defendant who is exercising tribal fishing rights is violative of the guidelines set forth in People v LeBlanc, 399 Mich. 31
(1976). In all other respects, leave to appeal is DENIED.
We do not retain jurisdiction.
Markman, J., not participating.
Court of Appeals No. 217137.
204 N.W.2d 38 PEOPLE v. RAY Docket No. 12187.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided September 27,…
562 N.W.2d 224 DETROIT EDISON COMPANY v PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION Docket Nos. 177054, 177055, 177062,…
376 N.W.2d 176 PEOPLE v BUTTS Docket No. 80186.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided August 5,…
223 N.W.2d 652 PEOPLE v ZUNIGA Docket No. 17453.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided October 21,…
308 N.W.2d 176 PEOPLE v SIDNEY SMITH Docket No. 50618.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided March…
545 N.W.2d 18 PEOPLE v McELHANEY Docket No. 162330.Michigan Court of Appeals.Submitted November 15, 1995,…