No. 139856.Supreme Court of Michigan.
April 30, 2010.
Court of Appeals No. 284512.
Leave to Appeal Granted.
The parties shall include among the issues to be briefed: (1) whether the content of the psychiatric evaluation report of Dr. Shahid as referenced by expert witnesses at trial was testimonial in nature, within the rule of Crawford v Washington, 541 US 36; 124 S Ct 1354; 158 L Ed 2d 177
(2004); (2) whether the introduction of Dr. Shahid’s opinion regarding the defendant’s mental state constituted impermissible hearsay; and (3) if the answer to either question (1) or (2) is in the affirmative, whether either error was harmless.
The Prosecuting Attorneys Association of Michigan and the Criminal Defense Attorneys of Michigan are invited to file briefs amicus curiae. Other persons or groups interested in the determination of the issues presented in this case may move the Court for permission to file briefs amicus curiae.
204 N.W.2d 38 PEOPLE v. RAY Docket No. 12187.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided September 27,…
562 N.W.2d 224 DETROIT EDISON COMPANY v PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION Docket Nos. 177054, 177055, 177062,…
376 N.W.2d 176 PEOPLE v BUTTS Docket No. 80186.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided August 5,…
223 N.W.2d 652 PEOPLE v ZUNIGA Docket No. 17453.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided October 21,…
308 N.W.2d 176 PEOPLE v SIDNEY SMITH Docket No. 50618.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided March…
545 N.W.2d 18 PEOPLE v McELHANEY Docket No. 162330.Michigan Court of Appeals.Submitted November 15, 1995,…