641 N.W.2d 856
No. 119903.Supreme Court of Michigan.
March 4, 2002.
COA: 220909, Oakland CC: 98-164037-FH.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal from the May 25, 2001 decision of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Corrigan, C.J., concurs and states as follows:
I concur in the order denying leave to appeal, but I continue to adhere to the views expressed in my dissenting statement in People v Maffett, 464 Mich. 878 (2001).
Page 959
204 N.W.2d 38 PEOPLE v. RAY Docket No. 12187.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided September 27,…
562 N.W.2d 224 DETROIT EDISON COMPANY v PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION Docket Nos. 177054, 177055, 177062,…
376 N.W.2d 176 PEOPLE v BUTTS Docket No. 80186.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided August 5,…
223 N.W.2d 652 PEOPLE v ZUNIGA Docket No. 17453.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided October 21,…
308 N.W.2d 176 PEOPLE v SIDNEY SMITH Docket No. 50618.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided March…
545 N.W.2d 18 PEOPLE v McELHANEY Docket No. 162330.Michigan Court of Appeals.Submitted November 15, 1995,…