639 N.W.2d 806
No. 119500.Supreme Court of Michigan.
January 15, 2002.
COA: 214941, Livingston CC: 97-010185-FC
On order of the Court, the delayed application for leave to appeal from the May 16, 2000 decision of the Court of Appeals is considered, and we REMAND this case to the trial court for appointment of the State Appellate Defenders Office to represent defendant in filing a supplemental application for leave to appeal to this Court addressing the issues of (1) whether defendant is entitled to a new trial based on newly discovered evidence consisting of eyewitness testimony concerning the bicycle accident or, in the alternative, (2) whether defendant was denied the effective assistance of trial counsel because counsel failed to interview and produce at trial eyewitnesses to the bicycle accident.
We retain jurisdiction.
204 N.W.2d 38 PEOPLE v. RAY Docket No. 12187.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided September 27,…
562 N.W.2d 224 DETROIT EDISON COMPANY v PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION Docket Nos. 177054, 177055, 177062,…
376 N.W.2d 176 PEOPLE v BUTTS Docket No. 80186.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided August 5,…
223 N.W.2d 652 PEOPLE v ZUNIGA Docket No. 17453.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided October 21,…
308 N.W.2d 176 PEOPLE v SIDNEY SMITH Docket No. 50618.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided March…
545 N.W.2d 18 PEOPLE v McELHANEY Docket No. 162330.Michigan Court of Appeals.Submitted November 15, 1995,…