584 N.W.2d 735
No. 110937.Supreme Court of Michigan.
September 22, 1998.
Leave to Appeal Denied September 22, 1998.
By order of February 24, 1998, the Supreme Court directed the defendant to show cause why the order of the Court of Appeals should not be reversed on the ground that the requirement of residential drug treatment as a condition of probation did not violate the plea and sentence agreement. On order of the Court, no response having been filed but the Court having been informed that the defendant has been discharged from his sentence of probation, the issue raised in the application is now moot.
Court of Appeals No. 203348.
204 N.W.2d 38 PEOPLE v. RAY Docket No. 12187.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided September 27,…
562 N.W.2d 224 DETROIT EDISON COMPANY v PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION Docket Nos. 177054, 177055, 177062,…
376 N.W.2d 176 PEOPLE v BUTTS Docket No. 80186.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided August 5,…
223 N.W.2d 652 PEOPLE v ZUNIGA Docket No. 17453.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided October 21,…
308 N.W.2d 176 PEOPLE v SIDNEY SMITH Docket No. 50618.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided March…
545 N.W.2d 18 PEOPLE v McELHANEY Docket No. 162330.Michigan Court of Appeals.Submitted November 15, 1995,…