691 N.W.2d 456
No. 126430.Supreme Court of Michigan.
January 27, 2005.
SC: 126430, COA: 254499, Emmet CC: 03-002026-FH; 03-002027-FH; 03-002028-FH; 03-002029-FH; 03-002030-FH.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 15, 2004 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED. Whatever the propriety of departing from the guideline range on the basis of defendant’s inability to pay restitution, the trial court articulated other substantial and compelling reasons on the basis of which we believe it would have departed from the guideline range to the same extent. We are not persuaded that the other questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
WEAVER, J., would deny leave to appeal without the further statement found in the majority’s order.
204 N.W.2d 38 PEOPLE v. RAY Docket No. 12187.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided September 27,…
562 N.W.2d 224 DETROIT EDISON COMPANY v PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION Docket Nos. 177054, 177055, 177062,…
376 N.W.2d 176 PEOPLE v BUTTS Docket No. 80186.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided August 5,…
223 N.W.2d 652 PEOPLE v ZUNIGA Docket No. 17453.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided October 21,…
308 N.W.2d 176 PEOPLE v SIDNEY SMITH Docket No. 50618.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided March…
545 N.W.2d 18 PEOPLE v McELHANEY Docket No. 162330.Michigan Court of Appeals.Submitted November 15, 1995,…