655 N.W.2d 552
No. 122583.Supreme Court of Michigan.
January 22, 2003.
COA: 228016, Kalamazoo CC: 99-001277-FC
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal from the October 4, 2002 decision of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Kelly, J., dissents and states as follows:
I would grant leave to appeal. This case raises the question whether a jury should be instructed that a woman charged with homicide is entitled to use deadly force to protect her nonviable fetus. The trial judge refused to give the instruction and the jury convicted defendant. The Court of Appeals reversed the conviction in a precedent-setting opinion for which there appears to be no supportive precedent.
It is manifest that the issue is significant in our state and national jurisprudence. Hence, it is incumbent on us, Michigan’s court of last resort, to examine the lower court rulings and provide guidance for the bench and bar on this important question.
Page 944
204 N.W.2d 38 PEOPLE v. RAY Docket No. 12187.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided September 27,…
562 N.W.2d 224 DETROIT EDISON COMPANY v PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION Docket Nos. 177054, 177055, 177062,…
376 N.W.2d 176 PEOPLE v BUTTS Docket No. 80186.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided August 5,…
223 N.W.2d 652 PEOPLE v ZUNIGA Docket No. 17453.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided October 21,…
308 N.W.2d 176 PEOPLE v SIDNEY SMITH Docket No. 50618.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided March…
545 N.W.2d 18 PEOPLE v McELHANEY Docket No. 162330.Michigan Court of Appeals.Submitted November 15, 1995,…