789 N.W.2d 466
No. 141825.Supreme Court of Michigan.
October 26, 2010.
Order
SC: 141825, COA: 299980, Isabella CC: 10-000054-FC
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 3, 2010 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
CORRIGAN, J. (concurring).
I concur in the order denying leave. I note that our review of the prosecutor’s argument — that the trial court wrongly excluded videotaped interviews of the defendant — was impeded by the prosecutor’s failure to provide the Court with copies of the excluded videos.
204 N.W.2d 38 PEOPLE v. RAY Docket No. 12187.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided September 27,…
562 N.W.2d 224 DETROIT EDISON COMPANY v PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION Docket Nos. 177054, 177055, 177062,…
376 N.W.2d 176 PEOPLE v BUTTS Docket No. 80186.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided August 5,…
223 N.W.2d 652 PEOPLE v ZUNIGA Docket No. 17453.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided October 21,…
308 N.W.2d 176 PEOPLE v SIDNEY SMITH Docket No. 50618.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided March…
545 N.W.2d 18 PEOPLE v McELHANEY Docket No. 162330.Michigan Court of Appeals.Submitted November 15, 1995,…