638 N.W.2d 754
No. 119720 (17).Supreme Court of Michigan.
December 21, 2001.
COA: 233462, Wayne CC: 95-007089
On order of the Court, the delayed application for leave to appeal from the May 2, 2001 decision of the Court of Appeals and the motion for appointment of counsel are considered, and they are DENIED, because the defendant’s motion for relief from judgment is prohibited by MCR 6.502(G), and he has failed to demonstrate an exception to that rule.
204 N.W.2d 38 PEOPLE v. RAY Docket No. 12187.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided September 27,…
562 N.W.2d 224 DETROIT EDISON COMPANY v PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION Docket Nos. 177054, 177055, 177062,…
376 N.W.2d 176 PEOPLE v BUTTS Docket No. 80186.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided August 5,…
223 N.W.2d 652 PEOPLE v ZUNIGA Docket No. 17453.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided October 21,…
308 N.W.2d 176 PEOPLE v SIDNEY SMITH Docket No. 50618.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided March…
545 N.W.2d 18 PEOPLE v McELHANEY Docket No. 162330.Michigan Court of Appeals.Submitted November 15, 1995,…