622 N.W.2d 792
No. 117125 and (51)(52).Supreme Court of Michigan.
January 30, 2001.
COA: 215670, Kent CC: 98-00254-FC.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal from the June 6, 2000 decision of the Court of Appeals, the motion for immediate consideration and the motion for evidentiary hearing are considered, and they are DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
204 N.W.2d 38 PEOPLE v. RAY Docket No. 12187.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided September 27,…
562 N.W.2d 224 DETROIT EDISON COMPANY v PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION Docket Nos. 177054, 177055, 177062,…
376 N.W.2d 176 PEOPLE v BUTTS Docket No. 80186.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided August 5,…
223 N.W.2d 652 PEOPLE v ZUNIGA Docket No. 17453.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided October 21,…
308 N.W.2d 176 PEOPLE v SIDNEY SMITH Docket No. 50618.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided March…
545 N.W.2d 18 PEOPLE v McELHANEY Docket No. 162330.Michigan Court of Appeals.Submitted November 15, 1995,…