656 N.W.2d 529

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CHESTER PATTERSON, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 122237 (16).Supreme Court of Michigan.
January 31, 2003.

COA: 241542, Kent CC: 00-014614

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal from the July 10, 2002 decision of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because defendant’s motion for relief from judgment is prohibited by MCR 6.502(G), and he has failed to demonstrate an exception to that rule. The motion to add an issue is also considered, and it is DENIED.

Tagged: