639 N.W.2d 806
No. 119741.Supreme Court of Michigan.
January 15, 2002.
COA: 197313, Genesee CC: 95-052884
On order of the Court, the delayed application for leave to appeal from the May 25, 2001 decision of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Cavanagh and Kelly, JJ., would direct the prosecutor to respond to the application for leave, to address with particularity the allegations in the January 27, 2000 affidavit concerning the complainant’s testimony that she never discussed the same with anyone, including representatives from the prosecutor’s office.
204 N.W.2d 38 PEOPLE v. RAY Docket No. 12187.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided September 27,…
562 N.W.2d 224 DETROIT EDISON COMPANY v PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION Docket Nos. 177054, 177055, 177062,…
376 N.W.2d 176 PEOPLE v BUTTS Docket No. 80186.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided August 5,…
223 N.W.2d 652 PEOPLE v ZUNIGA Docket No. 17453.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided October 21,…
308 N.W.2d 176 PEOPLE v SIDNEY SMITH Docket No. 50618.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided March…
545 N.W.2d 18 PEOPLE v McELHANEY Docket No. 162330.Michigan Court of Appeals.Submitted November 15, 1995,…