636 N.W.2d 139
No. 118770.Supreme Court of Michigan.
October 23, 2001.
COA: 231905, Jackson CC: 94-067820-FH.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal from the January 26, 2001 decision of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Cavanagh and Kelly, JJ., would remand this case to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration of the defendant’s motion for rehearing in light of updated documentation the defendant has supplied in support of his application for leave to appeal filed in this Court.
204 N.W.2d 38 PEOPLE v. RAY Docket No. 12187.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided September 27,…
562 N.W.2d 224 DETROIT EDISON COMPANY v PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION Docket Nos. 177054, 177055, 177062,…
376 N.W.2d 176 PEOPLE v BUTTS Docket No. 80186.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided August 5,…
223 N.W.2d 652 PEOPLE v ZUNIGA Docket No. 17453.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided October 21,…
308 N.W.2d 176 PEOPLE v SIDNEY SMITH Docket No. 50618.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided March…
545 N.W.2d 18 PEOPLE v McELHANEY Docket No. 162330.Michigan Court of Appeals.Submitted November 15, 1995,…